Index
1. Never heard of Codex?
2. North American Union and the European Union
3. Objectives of the New World Order
4. the process of 'gradualism' and 'Napoleonic Law'
5. Codex goals and objectives
6. The National Health Federation and the Alliance of Natural Health

Here's a quick summary of Codex goals and objectives, and this is from the National Health Federation:

International (global) harmonisation - 'Harm...onisation' - there's nothing good about this process;
Abolition of Organic Farming - through the abolition of labelling;
Introduction of GM food and livestock;
Removal of all ingredient-labelling;
And restriction of all Natural remedies, to include all supplements, herbs, vitamins, minerals, homeopathic remedies, flower remedies etc. etc.

People don't even realise in this country that the gradualism really kicked in two years ago, because there's still little bottles on the shelves that say supplement and vitamins and everything else, but get a bottle that is pre-2005 and get a current bottle and look at the dosage: the dosage has been dramatically reduced. The dosages that you can buy today in the UK are, basically, totally ineffectual - and this is the first step towards abolition.

So CODEX ALIMENTARIUS . . . :

Unlabelled GM processed foods which, of course, means low nutrients, low minerals, low vitamin values;
All vitamin and mineral supplements to be of low dosage, i.e. ineffectual;
And herbs and other natural health remedies to be classified as Drugs.


The Alliance for Natural Health right now is actually fighting a case on behalf of a lady in France who is being . . . charged with the equivalent legislation of being a drug dealer, because she was growing 'illegal' herbs.



Oh, and the connectivity of things. One thing I've learnt in the course of my research is, you know, the picture is never one dimensional. And here we have this situation coming down the track again where we're all going to have to switch to these low-energy light bulbs . . . but there's a big problem here, there is a very big problem, each bulb contains 5mg of MERCURY. Okay, so the bulbs last a bit longer but, basically, these bulbs are going to be used en-masse for the next ex-number of years - what's the disposal mechanism for them? Throw them in the trash. I mean, we haven't heard anything about the way in which these things are supposed to be disposed of, so they'll just go in to the trash, and they'll go into landfill. Multiply the number of homes in this country by the number of bulbs that people are discarding over a year, it's going into landfill - okay, it's not quite as bad as depleted Uranium, but it's ain't far off in the long term. We are poisoning the flipping water supply with things that are being sold to us on the basis of 'Oh it will help fight global warming', and up that construct of the Club of Rome from 1991. It's going to impact on the quality of food even if you did think you were going to be able to fight this.



This is The Independent on Sunday from a few weeks ago when it transpired that the British Government has been funding the research of GM crops in this country and stating that GM potatoes will be grown in this country in about 2009.


I have some DVD's of a film called 'The Future of Food', which talks about how Monsanto has been sowing the GM seeds in the West of the US - deliberately choosing the West, because the trade winds blow East, so contaminating the farms east of the trial farms. This was from the Director of Corporate Communications from Monsanto, and he says:

"Monsanto should not have to vouch for the safety of biotech food. Our interest is in selling as much of it as possible. Ensuring its safety is the job of the FDA." (Phil Angell, Director of Corporate Communications, Monsanto. New York Times, 28th October 1998.)


Well we've seen how the Food and Drug Administration deal with the sale of cloned meat! And who do you think is paying for the FDA? Who do you think pays for their holidays etc?........



This was from the Monsanto Inhouse Newsletter in October 6th, 2000:

"Agricultural biotechnology will find a supporter occupying the White House next year, regardless of which candidate wins the election . . . "

These guys have so much money that they can afford to buy everybody. There's only one organisation that funds more political activity in the US than the pharmaceutical and biotech industry - and they have a Star of David on their flag.



BIG PHARMA CONSPIRACY FACTS - Corporate Crime in the pharmaceutical industry.

Aspartame - Serck (it's actually Serle, not Serck I think) - but this is the guy I want to talk to you about, because there's a link between Aspartame and Tamiflu which, of course, is a life-saver to the latest outbreak of Bird Flu. Do you recognise the guy? Donald Rumsfeld. Donald Rumsfeld was a CEO of Serle, which is owned by Monsanto, and Serle developed Aspartame and obviously wanted to get it into the food chain. Well the FDA resisted, because obviously there was research that proved that it was causing brain damage in young rats. But that didn't stop the young Donald Rumsfeld and as soon as Reagan was appointed President, he made sure - because he financed Reagan's campaign - he made sure that Reagan removed the head of the FDA and a few months later, the new head of the FDA approved the use of Aspartame in the food chain. So, in the US today, there are a number of individual States . . . in a number of States, Aspartame is banned from drinks that are marketed under 12's. But, of course, here it's pumped into kids it's 'sugar free' - but it causes brain cancer in young rats.

Tamiflu. Gilead pharmaceutical developed Tamiflu. They couldn't do anything with it so they sold the marketing rights to Roach and it was just lost in the marass of drugs that don't go anywhere. But then Donald Rumsfeld was appointed Secretary of State and all of a sudden 'Bird Flu' is the new big danger. And, of course, it's still being bumped as the 'big danger'. I read just yesterday that Alan Johnson, the British Health Secretary, has just authorised the purchase of another 14 million dosage of Tamiflu. And do you know what, Gilead pharmaceutical's own documentation says that Tamiflu only delays the symptoms for between 24-48 hours. It's useless! And Alan Johnson has said that he's also purchased a whole bunch of antibiotics to deal with those cases where Tamiflu doesn't deal with the symptoms. I mean, this is outrageous. I mean, if something is coming down the line I can assure you ain't Bird Flu, and Tamiflu is going to be a complete waste of time.


A comment from the Natural Solutions Foundation, an organisation I'll mention later, and they said:

Codex Alimentarius is the shrewd vehicle for protecting the pharmaceutical industry. The industry has decided upon an unethical course of action by using deception and deceit in the quest to eliminate natural health products completely.


There is an organisation called the Natural Association of Health Food Stores, who you would think would be natural allies in the fight against the implementation of Codex. Well, there you'd be wrong, because the NAHFS have been targetted by the pharmaceutical industry and they have been shown how much greater their profits will be when they start selling synthetics over natural products. This is really a test for everybody: a test in terms of integrity and ethics.


Here's what's going on. The pharmaceutical companies are losing revenue hand-over-fist because people are turning to natural health products. And one of the biggest campaigners for this is a guy called Dr. Rath and he's produced this pocket-sized book called 'Road Map to Health'. Dr. Rath's claim to fame...and he's a hero in South Africa, because this guy realised that the pharmaceutical companies were making money hand-over-fist out of Aids. (Daily Mail by Karol Sikora, THE EPIDEMIC THAT NEVER WAS.) So he did his own research and what he discovered was that actually if you don't give drugs to people who are HIV positive but you treat them with natural remedies, you know, you get them to change their diet and you get them to use herbal remedies, they don't actually develop Aids. It's only when you start giving them the ARV's that they turn into Aids' victims. He's written this amazing book called 'End Aids' here and, of course, funnily enough, Dr Rath is not exactly favour of the day with the pharmaceutical companies, because they've lost a massive revenue stream from South Africa . . .


This was from The Times a few weeks ago . . . : 'Expert backs prescription by clinicians' - this is the biggest threat to the vast majority of complementary health practitioners, because part of the quest of the pharmaceutical companies is literally to shut out all non-medically qualified practitioners. So if you've qualified as a doctor first and then gone on to alternative therapies, then at least for the time being with the current plans of Codex you would still be able to prescribe medicines. This is the case in Germany right now. Homeopathic medicines are available but only when prescribed by a clinician.


2005, the Alliance for Natural Health launched a campaign in the European Courts to try and prevent Codex being implemented. The Judge was very sympathetic because the Judge, who was a EU Advocate General, referred to the arbitrary powers of the Codex-supporting EU legislation as being "about as transparent as a black box." Basically he was saying, and this is April 2005, 'no way, Codex. Take it away, it's not coming in to the EU, because we don't know what it's all about.' But Codex...or the World Trade Organisation decided that they would launch a case in the International Court of Justice in Luxembourg, and that case came to court on July 12th, 2005 . . . On July 12th, 2005, the International Court of Justice over-ruled the EU.

July 12th ruling of the International Court of Justice in Luxenbourg followed the July 4th Rome meeting of Codex when the 85 countries present ratified the restrictive guidelines for dietary supplements. Canada and the USA amongst them. Objections from China and South Africa ignored. Just as in the original 2001 version, the current guidelines of the EU directive strictly prohibit information about diseases being treatable by nutrient - it is fundamentally illegal for a doctor to advise a patient that their condition may improve if they change their diet. This is outrageous.


Continued....................